Because invasive carp management is so wide-ranging and complex, our ability to combine our expertise and resources is the main leverage we have to face the threat effectively. Coordinated management mainly falls under these inter-related categories:
- State-led targeted mass removal for the most suppressive effect
- Developing deterrent technologies and constructing barriers to impede invasive carp movement and prevent range expansion
- Monitoring to inform all aspects of management and detect new spread early so we can prevent additional populations from establishing.
Experts from the Invasive Carp Regional Coordination Committee’s membership have formed specialized work groups to focus on certain aspects of invasive carp management, such as:
- Monitoring the distribution, abundance, congregating habits and movement of invasive carp populations in the Illinois River to inform mass removal and other management actions, and to assess our effectiveness over time
- Developing, maintaining and evaluating fish deterrent technologies and constructing barriers to block pathways between the Mississippi River basin and Great Lakes basin
- Conducting extensive on-the-water sampling throughout the Upper Illinois Waterway and the Great Lakes for any detections of invasive carp, or their environmental DNA, in new areas
- Contingency planning and practice to prepare for rapid response to various new detection situations most effectively
- Developing technology and methods for consolidating and analyzing data that help us continually refine all management actions
- Preventing grass carp from becoming established, with priority on efforts in western Lake Erie
- Improving our understanding of the black carp’s age, growth, distribution and abundance
- Providing information to the public and water-related industries to prevent unintentional introductions of invasive carp in new areas
- Sharing information about the work we do to fulfill our commitment to the public we serve
Coordination and Planning
In addition to the ongoing coordination taking place among our specialized work groups, we have developed a formal, cyclical process for carrying out priority projects, evaluating their effectiveness and refining our plans for what comes next.
Each year, members evaluate their previous years’ work and collaborate to identify priority projects and cost-sharing proposals going forward. Through a process facilitated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, priority projects receive supplemental funding through the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative. This regional investment from the U.S. Congress targets the most significant threats to the health of the Great Lakes, including invasive carp. This funding has been pivotal in allowing state agencies to expand their efforts in their jurisdictional waters and address the invasive carp threat for the benefit of the entire Great Lakes region.
The full range of priority projects is compiled into an annual action plan and published in the Spring. In recent years, we have carried out around 45 priority projects at a total cost-shared amount of nearly $50 million per year. The Great Lakes Restoration Initiative provides $21 million of that total amount. Toward the end of each year, we begin the annual evaluation and planning process once again.